Page 679 - e-Book
P. 679
accepted system of subgeneric classification, to check whether the leaf morphological
clustering is similar to the subgeneric classification or not.
RESULT
The 12 species of Ficus studied showed morphological variations in leaf characters.
They showed variations in the size, shape and indumentum pattern of the leaf. The phenetic
analysis separated the 12 species of Ficus with considerable level of dissimilarity based on
the leaf morphology (Fig 2).
Fig 2. Dendrogram generated using PAST Ver 2 software showing leaf morphology-based
clustering.
The maximum similarity was observed for F. talbotii & F. binnendijkii, with a
similarity value of 80 %. On comparison with the current classification of Ficus (Berg, 2003),
the leaf morphology-based clustering was entirely different. Most of the subgenera was not
clustered together. The much similar clustering was observed for the subg. Urostigma with
all the three species clustered together along with a subg. Sycomorus member. Thus, it was
observed that the leaf morphology-based clustering is different with the current system of
classification.
669