Page 101 - e-Book
P. 101

Pande, P. (1999). Comparative vegetation analysis and sal (Shorea robusta) regeneration in

                     relation to their disturbance magnitude in some sal forests. Tropical Ecology, 40(1), 51-
                     61.

               Pandey, S., & Shukla, R. (2001). Regeneration strategy and plant diversity status in degraded
                     sal forests. Current Science, 95-102.

               Pandey, S., & Shukla, R. (2003). Plant diversity in managed sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn.)
                     forests of Gorakhpur, India: species composition, regeneration and conservation.

                     Biodiversity & Conservation, 12(11), 2295-2319.

               Saxena, H. O., & Brahmam, M. (1994). The flora of Orissa (Vol. 1): Regional Research
                     Laboratory; Orissa Forest Development Corporation.

               Shankar, U. (2001). A case of high tree diversity in a sal (Shorea robusta)-dominated lowland

                     forest of Eastern Himalaya: Floristic composition, regeneration and conservation.
                     Current Science, 776-786.

               Shankar, U., Lama, S., & Bawa, K. (1998). Ecosystem reconstruction
                     throughtaungya'plantations following commercial logging of a dry, mixed deciduous

                     forest in Darjeeling Himalaya. Forest Ecology and Management, 102(2-3), 131-142.
               Tiwari, S. K., Alfred, J., & Patnaik, S. (1998). An account of the Mammalian Fauna of

                     Chandaka Wildlife Sanctuary, Orissa. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, 96(1-

                     4), 25.









































                                                           91
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106